Criteria for Assessment of Variant Pathogenicity

For Mitomap to assign a status of "Cfrm" to a possibly pathogenic variant, we look for confirming reports which address the criteria outlined in Mitchell et al 2006, Yarham et al 2011, Wong 2007, and Gonzalez-Viogue et al 2014. The following table shows the points we take into consideration. A new scoring system is under development and will be linked here once published.

MITOMAP Variant Assessment: Pathogenicity Criteria

  • Independent reports of two or more unrelated families with evidence of similar disease
  • Evolutionary conservation of the nucleotide (for RNA variants) or amino acid (for coding variants)
  • Presence of heteroplasmy
  • Correlation of variant with phenotype / segregation of the mutation with the disease related to the mutant load within a family
  • Biochemical defects in complexes I, III, IV, or V of the respiratory chain in affected or multiple tissues
  • Functional studies showing differential defects segregating with the mutation (cybrid or single fiber studies)
  • Histochemical evidence of a mitochondrial disorder
  • For fatal or severe clinical phenotypes, the absence or extremely rare occurrence of the variant in large mtDNA sequence databases.

This topic: MITOMAP > ConfirmedCriteria
Topic revision: 18 Sep 2019, MarieLott
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback